1) The MOU governing canine searches was effective in November 2009 and has not been updated in the ten years since while it annually auto-renews for the past ten years. As the document refers to annual automatic renewal unless terminated by either party, please provide dates, copies of the agenda on which an annual review was performed as well as copies of minutes or other documents showing the discussion and diligence which (should have) taken place annually before the BOE or another central office party just allowed this to automatically renew.
2) Regarding Policy 9260, this was last reviewed and revised in June 2014. Please provide the schedule showing when this will be reviewed in coming months before this lapses by June 2020 under the six year review cycle as mandated by Policy 2020. In lieu of any review and update before June 2020, please provide information as to what will take its place when the current review period runs out and expires at the six year mark in June 2020.
3) Please provide a copy of the governing policy which states that documents incorporated by reference (as in the case of the canine search MOU referenced at Policy 9260) are NOT required to be concurrently reviewed and amended along with the Policy itself no less frequently than every six years. Otherwise, does the implied required annual review before allowing auto renewal (see item 1 above) cover this, assuming such annual review happened? In general, what is the policy on referenced documents as to the timing of review along with the master policy in which it is incorporated?
4) For each year since the canine search MOU was effective in 2009, please provide dates in which training to school administration was performed (annually?) and agenda of the training which would ensure that the MOU is implemented consistently and accurately at each and every school.
5) Please provide a copy of all data tracked and perhaps used in reviewing the effectiveness and safety of the canine search MOU, including but not limited to the following. None of this is personally identifiable to any student as it is simply numbers and schools; if you prefer to provide as "school A, school B, etc" please do so since the numbers and school years/dates are what is most important.
• For each school year dating back to 2009 when the canine search MOU was signed, how many canine searches were performed throughout HCPSS?
• For each canine search since 2009, identify if this was within the building or on the school parking lot.
• For each canine search since 2009, identify if a full scan of the premises was conducted (as the MOU allows a scan meaning full premises) or if random students or vehicles were selected when there was no reasonable suspicion to select these students or vehicles, or if in fact a reasonable suspicion was first established before directing the canine to a specific student or vehicle.
• For each canine search in a high school parking lot (identified by school year and name of school or " school A", "school B", etc), identify the total number of vehicles to which the canine was directed to sniff (full parking lot or a random few), how many of these yielded an alleged "alert" by the canine to warrant further physical search, and how many then were found to be false positive alerts by the canine in that nothing was found when a vehicle was physically searched.
• For each of the false positives counted above, identify how many were the result of initially randomly selecting vehicles or how many were the result of choosing vehicles where there was a reasonable suspicion to do so in the first place (policy 9260).
• In general when deciding whether or not to allow this MOU to annually renew, identify the data considered by HCPSS leadership as to the known error rate of the canines in frequency of "false positives".